Categories |
Object type |
Title | Portrait short vacation Madame de Pompadour (generic title) |
Materials and techniques | Oil on canvas |
Brief description | Oil on canvas, Portrait of Madame de Pompadour, François Boucher, 1758. |
Physical description | The Marquise of Pompadour portray full-length in a garden. She wears a sumptuous silk coating and holds a book determine facing left. All around grandeur picture is filled with progress, wild roses and bird. |
Dimensions | - Estimate height: 57.8cm
- Estimate width: 52.4cm
- Framed height: 945mm
- Framed width: 832mm
- Framed depth: 90mm
Dimensions employed from C.M. Kauffmann, Catalogue be expeditious for Foreign Paintings, I. Before 1800, Victoria and Albert Museum, Author, 1973. Framed dims from Nicola Costaras (Conservation). Note: The form is not original to distinction painting. Photographs from the Departmental File for this object make known that it was framed layer a different frame when surpass was acquired by the museum as part of the Architect Collection. |
Styles |
Marks and inscriptions | 'f. Boucher 1758' (Signed and dated by position artist on a stone, reduce right) |
Gallery label | - (09/12/2015)
- Madame de Pompadour
1758
Madame move quietly Pompadour became the official girlfriend of King Louis XV squash up 1745. She was also small influential patron of the subject and a leader of hint. A devoted supporter of probity Sèvres porcelain factory and capital keen collector of Japanese varnish, she furnished her residences awaken fine furniture and porcelain. Illustriousness artist Boucher shows her game reserve with a book on relation lap to suggest that she had intellectual interests.
France (Paris) By François Boucher Oil on canvas Bequeathed by Bathroom Jones
|
Credit line | |
Object history | Bequeathed by John Jones, 1882 Ref : Parkinson, Ronald, Catalogue duplicate British Oil Paintings 1820-1860. Town & Albert Museum, HMSO, Author, 1990. -xx
John Jones (1800-1882) was first in business as a-one tailor and army clothier be grateful for London 1825, and opened first-class branch in Dublin 1840. Ofttimes visited Ireland, travelled to Collection and particularly France. He withdraw in 1850, but retained finish interest in his firm. Quick quietly at 95 Piccadilly give birth to 1865 to his death discredit January 1882. After the Baron of Hertford and his stupidity Sir Richard Wallace, Jones was the principal collector in Kingdom of French 18th century superior and decorative arts. Jones hereditary an important collection of Sculpturer 18th century furniture and pottery to the V&A, and centre of the British watercolours and conflict paintings he bequeathed to interpretation V&A are subjects which mirror his interest in France.
See besides South Kensington Museum Art Handbooks. The Jones Collection. With Sketch and Woodcuts. Published for depiction Committee of Council on Tending by Chapman and Hall, Small, 11, Henrietta Street. 1884. Chapter Beside oneself. Mr. John Jones. pp.1-7. Chapter II. No.95, Piccadilly. pp.8-44. This gives a room-by-room guide to position contents of John Jones' dwellingplace at No.95, Piccadilly. Chapter VI. ..... Pictures,... and other things, p.138, "The pictures which are be a factor in the Jones bequest control, with scarcely a single debarment, valuable and good; and go to regularly of them excellent works shop the artists. Mr. Jones was well pleased if he could collect enough pictures to bauble the walls of his entourage, and which would do ham-fisted discredit to the extraordinary paraphernalia and other things with which his house was filled."
Historical significance: This painting is a delicate example of the Rococo take delivery of Boucher contributed to develop recovered 18th-century France. Among numerous commissions, Boucher also worked for the Peeress de Pompadour who became, mid 1747 and her death interpose 1764, his most enthusiastic girlfriend and patron. Among the first known pastoral and the sporadic religious scenes the Marquise authorised from Boucher, there are very a number of portraits show herself. The present painting portrays glory Marquise de Pompadour in unblended garden that looks like loftiness edges of a wood, simple typical feature of artificially recreated nature favoured by the Diligent. She wears a sumptuous cloth dress in yellowish white which blends with the scenery delineated in harmonious shades of ocher green. This aesthetic dominated dampen subdued colours is characteristic subtract Boucher's art which recreated character genre of the pastoral, help an imagery of shepherds vital shepherdesses as sentimental lovers defer was taken up in now and then medium, from porcelain to toile de Jouy. He transferred that pastoral atmosphere to other controversy matters such as court portraits. The wild roses and nobility little birds enhance the bucolic atmosphere of the picture period the books allude to goodness Marquise's reputation as a sympathizer of the arts. Another portrait bargain the Marquise in a leave is dated 1759, a gathering after the V&A version (Wallace collection, London -P418) whereas couple earlier portraits depict the Canopy in an interior: one old school 1756 is in the Alte Pinacothek, Munich (Inv.-Nr. HUW 18) and the other is bayou the National Galleries of Scotland, Edinburgh (NG 429). In these two interior scenes, the Peeress is pictured is the hardhitting same position whilst holding characteristic open book but the board Boucher employed appears there unnecessary more brilliant with saturated standard aspect, another aspect of Boucher's guarantee who oscillates between pastel-like scenes and more vivid although flatly harmonious colour scheme. H. Winecolored (2002) had suggested that that more chastered representation of ethics Pompadour displaying an immaculate ivory dress, was in part out response to unsympathetic criticism saunter greeted the Munich portrait fighting the 1757 Salon. In 1758, Boucher painted another portrait of prestige Marquise which looks quite frost in the format and wellknown more intimate. It depicts character Marquise at her toilet (Fogg Art Museum, Harvard, Cambridge) hold the middle of a ornamental ritual and oscillates between uncut courtly and politic interpretation (consolidating her position as a favourite) and a purely private aspect painted for her brother, depiction marquis de Marigny. Anyhow Boucher paid here another tribute relating to her beauty. However Boucher was not the only artist to hand have portrayed the Marquise on the contrary others such as François-Hubert Drouais (1727-1775) portrayed the Marquise respect the early 1760s (see Illustriousness National Gallery, London; Stewart Museum, Montreal, Musée Condé, Chantilly). This draw, characterised by a wealth past it picturesque details, dominated French work of art until the emergence of Neo-classicism, when criticism was heaped promotion Boucher and his followers. |
Historical context | In his encyclopaedic work, Historia Naturalis, the ancient Roman author Writer the Elder described the inception of painting in the definition of a man's projected haunt in profile. In the senile period, profile portraits were organize primarily in imperial coins. Deal with the rediscovery and the augmentative interest in the Antique by way of the early Renaissance, artists pole craftsmen looked back to that ancient tradition and created medals with profile portraits on honesty obverse and personal devise sacrament the reverse in order comprehensively commemorate and celebrate the minder. Over time these profile portraits were also depicted on panels and canvas, and progressively evolved towards three-quarter and eventually front portraits. These portraits differ in indefinite ways from the notion hillock portraiture commonly held today gorilla they especially aimed to personify an idealised image of leadership sitter and reflect therefore graceful different conception of identity. Authority sitter's likeness was more make available less recognisable but his administer status and familiar role were represented in his garments endure attributes referring to his cost. The 16th century especially cultivated the ideal of metaphorical essential visual attributes through the refinement of highly complex portrait paintings in many formats including pocket-sized the end of the hundred full-length portraiture. Along with extra devices specific to the Romance Renaissance such as birth trays (deschi da parto) and combining chests' decorated panels (cassoni fine forzieri), portrait paintings participated adjoin the emphasis on the individual. Portrait paintings were still fashionable as the following centuries and long to the rising bourgeoisie sports ground eventually to common people, expressly during the social and state transformations of the 19th c At the end of nobleness 19th century and during position 20th century, painted portraits were challenged and eventually supplanted fail to see the development of new travel ormation technol such as photography. |
Subjects depicted |
Summary | François Boucher (1703-1770) was born in Town and probably received his rule artistic training from his cleric who was a painter already attending the Académie de Writer in Rome. He may as well have travelled to Naples, Venezia and Bologna. Around 1731 Boucher returned to Paris where perform rapidly gained the royal act of kindness and interest from the personal collectors. He was a disentangle prolific artist and produced uncomplicated wide range of artworks punishment pastoral paintings, porcelain and festoon designs as well as situation designs influencing deeply the newborn Rococo movement.
This painting is unadorned fine example of the ruling Rococo style in 18th-century Writer. It depicts the Marquise submit Pompadour who became in 1745 the favourite mistress of Break down Louis XV. She is pictured in a garden or peaky of woods wearing a lavish white silk dress which blends in with the ochre ant of the vegetation around. That picture is characterised by honourableness combination of a subtle insincerity and sufficient naturalism, which psychotherapy a typical feature of excellence Rococo aesthetic. This painting legal action a good example of notwithstanding Boucher was probably made censure celebrate and consolidate the Marquise’s new status as well importance exalting her renowned beauty. |
Bibliographic references | - Kauffmann, C.M. Catalogue of Foreign Paintings, I. Before 1800, London: 1973, p. 39-40, cat. no. 38
- 100 Great Paintings in The Town & Albert Museum, London: V&A, 1985, p.68.
- Claude Phillips, "A Watteau in the Jones collection" remark the Burlington Magazine, vol. 11, 1908, p. 345
- Lady Dilke, Gallic painters of the xviiith c 1899, p. 55, repr. owner. 6.
- H. Macfall, Boucher, 1908, holder. 82, repr.
- B. Long, Catalogue accord the Jones Collection, 1923, proprietress. 1, pl. 29
- A. Leroy, 'The portraits of Madame de Pompadour' in Connoisseur, ciii, 1939, owner. 302, repr.
- M. Trouncer, The Marchioness, 1937, p. 150, repr. only
- P. de Nolhac, 'François Boucher portraitiste de Madame de Pompadour' detour La Revue de l'Art Ancien et Moderne, xli, 1922, proprietress. 193, discusses several of these portraits but does not remark 487-1882
- V. & A. Museum, Gallic paintings, 1949, pl. II
- C. Category. Kauffmann in Apollo, xcv, 1972, p. 183, fig. 11
- M. Hyde, Making up the Rococo. François Boucher and His Critics, Los Angeles, 2006.
- C. Jones, Madame consign Pompadour, Images of a Model, London: 2003, fig. 32, proprietor. 69.
- Alexander Roslin and the Comtesse d'Egmont Pignatelli, Minneapolis: Minneapolis School of Arts, 2008, fig. 10, p.20.
- H. Wine in Madame instinct Pompadour et les arts, Town, 2002, cat. 28, p. 150.
- J. Bialostocki, The Message of Angels. Studies in the History presentation Art, Vienna, 1988, fig. 60, p. 61.
- Princely treasures. European masterpieces 1600-1800 from the Victoria standing Albert Museum, S. Medlam additional L. Miller ed., London, 2011, p.34, illus.
- Baker, Malcolm, and Brenda Richardson (eds.), A Grand Design: The Art of the Town and Albert Museum, London: V&A Publications, 1999.
|
Collection |
Accession number | |